Acne Research Today is a free monthly online journal that collates and summarizes the latest research about Acne, including details on skin problems, diet, treatments, puberty. | ||||||||
|
Long-pulsed dye laser versus long-pulsed dye laser-assisted photodynamic therapy for acne vulgaris: A randomized controlled trial.Haedersdal M, Togsverd-Bo K, Wiegell SR, Wulf HC Department of Dermatology, Bispebjerg Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. mhaedersdal@dadlnet.dk BACKGROUND: Long-pulsed dye laser (LPDL)-assisted photodynamic therapy has been suggested to be superior to laser alone for acne vulgaris but no evidence is available. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of LPDL alone versus LPDL in photodynamic therapy with methylaminolevulinic acid (MAL-LPDL) for acne vulgaris. METHODS: Fifteen patients received a series of 3 full-face LPDL treatments and half-face prelaser MAL treatments; the latter being randomly assigned to the left or right side. RESULTS: Inflammatory lesions were reduced more on MAL-LPDL-treated than on LPDL-treated sides (week 4: 70% vs 50%, P = .003; week 12: 80% vs 67%, P = .004). Noninflammatory lesions reduced similarly. Patient satisfaction was slightly greater with MAL-LPDL versus LPDL treatments (scale 0-10: week 4: 7 vs 6, P = .034; week 12: 8 vs 7.5, P = .034). Fluorescence measurements detected photobleaching with MAL-LPDL (35.3%) and LPDL (7.3%) treatments (P < .001). Erythema, edema, and pustular eruptions intensified from MAL incubation. No patients experienced pigment changes or scarring. LIMITATIONS: The sample size was limited. The split-face design in this randomized controlled trial does not allow us to draw conclusions about the efficacy of the LPDL, only about the efficacy of MAL-LPDL compared with LPDL alone. CONCLUSIONS: MAL-LPDL is slightly superior to LPDL for the treatment of inflammatory acne. Published 18 February 2008 in J Am Acad Dermatol, 58(3): 387-94.
© 2004-2008 Acne Research Today. All Rights Reserved. |
| ||||||
